Newton did not consider himself a physicist, as the term was not in use, he was a Natural Philosopher!
Quantum London Trading 4,434 replies
Quantum London Trading Custom EA 1,505 replies
Quantum 00 Level Daily Trading 137 replies
Application of physics in trading? 6 replies
Short Term Trading is Quantum Physics 55 replies
DislikedThis is the funniest thread I have come across since I've been a member here.
Call me unimaginative but I simply cannot accept that the native Aboriginees saw only a "ripple" when Captain Cook sailed in a f*ck off ship.Ignored
DislikedHi Blueruby,
I think the conception of atoms as little hard golf/snooker/king kongs' balls is flawed.I mean, I think we all percieve them that way and your analogy sheds light as to the minute scale of these things, but at this scale the material world does cease to exist. I believe it is to do, in part, with the relative strenghts of the fundamental forces. The Earth can orbit the sun under the influence of gravity, but at the sub atomic level gravity is negligible. Unfortunately our human sizedness (if thats a word) does not allow us to "experience" the nuclear forces.
I like to think of everything as a wavicle, rather than a particle or a wave. Its just that big stuff is very particley and small stuff is very wavy. Inbetween stuff like radiation "particles" can be either depending on how you look at them.Ignored
DislikedRemember, the market does not exist - we create the market in our head.Ignored
DislikedInteresting theory, but.... I'm not buying into it.
Unfortunately the market is not the imagination of several million people, it is a reality (and not a fabrication,) often controlled by a few select Central Bankers. Bankers on agendas move markets, not the masses.Ignored
DislikedSince it is against the very definition of rationalism to base an argument or statement in probability, the original post is neither Decartian nor physical in content. Decartes thought is a substantiative form of metacognition. All that have been posted here are slightly sophomoric opinions. Ironically, the original post doesn't hold to Decartian scrutiny.
As far as quantum physics goes, sharpen a pencil. It's amazing how so many believe it's nature is textual and that any meaningful nonformulaic discussion can exist in regards to it. Lets say one grapples with nuclear physics; then quantum mechanics will definitely lower the boom and this discourse hasn't broken up to differential calc yet.
If discussion is to continue, drop the keyboards and get out the chalkboards.Ignored
DislikedMore on Quantum physics .... anyone???
come on guys, share ur ideas...Ignored