Disliked{quote} Hi again ygr, I was not at my computer when I took those trades yesterday...I got a signal to my phone and entered remotely. Going back and finding when these trades were and then organising screenshots and everything is a bit beyond me right now as I am too busy prepping my house to sell before I move overseas. Regarding your suggestion, I think it is a great idea, and covers an area of logic that had totally escaped me! I like the "magnitude" idea...so perhaps the logic would be to calculate the change in separation between the closing...Ignored
Hello,
I have seen that for this strategy there are several ways to approach it: With Correlb + QQE, Correlb + Correlb, hoping that each line crossing Correlb 0 in the opposite direction, the distance between the two lines is equal to or greater than 52, ...
The truth is that there are several ways to approach it and have a few doubts. which is not the right strategy.
I see you've used several different strategies or variations of the principal. When you use each ??
What SL use ??? I see that in some cases you used when the distance is less than 52 Correlb, and others use a line Correlb crossing the line "0". In other cases the crossing is used in the opposite direction of QQE.
I'm a little confused with so many variants. What works for you you ???
Thanks for everything.
a greeting