Disliked{quote}
wow Pete, you missed the whole point :/ Brain: the Author words dismissing math. Eyes: charts posted using math measuring. "As if we decide for brain over eyes then why do something that might reduce thinking which is a total brain exercise." that's the point of my question, if math help reduce thinking and probabilities and make it easier to win in trading, "brain exercise" would be irrelevant. anyway, in my years of trading, every time I hear "probabilities" from someone, I know for a fact that they don't know "direction"....Ignored
Crikey Kwt, that'll be a first ()
While maybe it was you who missed the point, possible ?
https://www.forexfactory.com/thread/...9#post14382249
Read the post again. And the attached short four page pdf.
The headline comment was kev's.
The author mainly discusses probabilities AND which must clearly be maths based, yes ?
While your own comment "for a spar lol" separates probabilty somehow now into certainty.
If this "possibility" OF CERTAINTY of direction can occur then please explain why the million dollar quants at Renaissance can only achieve a 51% strike rate based on
trade direction.
This certainty that folks offer has not yet been shown, while many claim its possibility.
AND
If we assume (which I am happy to do) that Directional Intent is possible.
THEN
we need to ask ourselves a simple question.
Why can't this be done visually. with our eyes & brain, and without MATHS ?
1