Disliked{quote} Man on a second look, I agree with Takisd, in comparison to 5ers at least. (The new site is up by the way, with all the details). The direct funding thing is probably not for me either, but if I were to pick any one it would be MFF. However, it only makes sense if you're aiming for at least the $20,000 account. Anything below is just cheating yourself. Okay, the $10,000 emphatic account with 10% max DD and 1:100 lev. Is also not bad For the conventional, compared to 5ers and CTI you get - 1:50 lev 5% max DD (which eliminates the risk of...Ignored
the other part i fully agree, 50/50 split makes no sense when the trader responsible for all the dd alone...70/30 does make sense in such scenario.
like the above example, i wrote on 5ers, the risk shouldering flips when the trader progress from initial lvl1 to lvl2, and gets 4x equity.
else,
would someone smart be kind and explain my what is assured funding means? (highlighted line), those numbers doesnt make any sense to me in any way i can think of...
many thx in advance!
oh, almost forget: with the 50% split, the Emphatic version of 10% max dd would need to produce 20% profit to be back to cost (BE) for the trader at 50/50 split...not at all an ideal proposal really.
with careful trading that doesnt happen overnight.
looking at my 2021 stat of my main trading acct, that is 4 months of trading literally, bcos the weekly payout also means there is literally nothing to compound. give some, take some. that is a rather long time to get back the money paid upfront. one could argue that it is so easy to consistently make 10-20% monthly, so why average 5%, but i beg to differ when it comes for consistent returns on the longer run.
there is always, always another trade!!
1