- Search Energy EXCH
- 60 Results
- nelhajj replied Jun 24, 2020
Here's a screenshot of the table I have here, just so that we could still keep up with the results: image
- nelhajj replied Jun 24, 2020
I was still unsure if I should test both classical and hidden divergences together, but then I decided that it's better to test each one by itself to get a better idea of the stats of each one. So here are the test results of the classical ...
- nelhajj replied Jun 11, 2020
Here are the tests for RSI(14) entering overbought/oversold territory. I can say that the results were just as anticipated. We have seen that this type of signal was more accurate than the other signals tested on RSI. We also know by now that ...
- nelhajj replied Jun 9, 2020
I decided to organize the overall results in a table so that we'll always have a reference: url I will add it to the first post for future reference. You could sort all the entries by indicator, period, signal, accuracy and frequency. You could ...
- nelhajj replied Jun 9, 2020
Finally! A signal that is at least a bit accurate, or at least one that qualifies as an actual signal. The following tests were made on RSI(5), to check how often price goes up when RSI crosses level 70 upwards and thus enters the "overbought" area. ...
- nelhajj replied Jun 4, 2020
Sure, here they are. I basically divide the number of occurrences by the total numbers of bars in a test. file file file file
- nelhajj replied Jun 4, 2020
I have just finished testing the overbought/oversold area exit on RSI(14), and the results are not as uniform as the previous tests. By that I mean that if you look at the detailed report you won't see the same thing that we saw in previous tests ...
- nelhajj replied Jun 1, 2020
I just finished testing the RSI(5) signal from exiting the overbought/oversell areas, and I have to say I didn't expect these results. The signal was much less accurate than I had anticipated. The signal I tested is when RSI(5) crosses level 70 ...
- nelhajj replied Jun 1, 2020
As I was about to start the new tests, I realized there was a mix up in my previous tests. The results above were actually for RSI crossing the 50 line, not the ones for it exiting the overbought/oversold areas. Sorry about that, my files got mixed ...
- nelhajj replied May 31, 2020
I just finished testing the same signal on RSI(14) and the results are interesting. The accuracy is better on all timeframes and all pairs by at least 2%. Here are the overall Frequency and Accuracy rates: image Compared to RSI(5), ...
- nelhajj replied May 30, 2020
I have finished testing on RSI(5), and I have attached the detailed results in a pdf. Just like in the first two tests on EURUSD and AUDUSD, the rest of the pairs showed little to no improvement in accuracy, leading to an overall 47% accuracy of the ...
- nelhajj replied May 25, 2020
A free limited version of the indicator is now available. It works on H1 only but it's free to use for as long as you want: url
- nelhajj replied May 21, 2020
I'm offering a 7-day free trial for the Signal Strength Meter: url And here's a video that explains everything about the Signal Strength Meter: video
- nelhajj replied May 17, 2020
May 10th to 15th 2020: Here are last week's results using the Tangram indicator on 3 pairs: EURUSD, GBPUSD and EURGBP on H1. Total profit: +270 Pips Win rate: 52.3% image image image Settings used: Oscillator Period: 30 Oscillator Level: 60 ...
- nelhajj replied May 2, 2020
Friday May 1st Results of Trading the Tangram Indicator on EURUSD H1: Total Trades: 2 Long Trades Total Profit: +120 Pips Trade #1: +60 Pips -Bought at 1.09457 at 01:00 GMT -Closed at Take Profit at 1.10057 at 14:35 GMT Trade #2: +60 Pips -Bought at ...
- nelhajj replied Oct 9, 2019
image And here's the link for it: url
- nelhajj replied Oct 6, 2019
Just finished optimizing on GBPUSD since January 2012, and here's the result. The settings file is attached at the bottom. image Don't forget to share the love guys! url file
- nelhajj replied Sep 30, 2019
Also, if you guys could rate the indicator on mql5 it would be awesome cause I got a bad review for no reason... apparently people who dislike something are more likely to rate it than ppl who do url
- nelhajj replied Sep 30, 2019
Do you guys prefer we try to make version 1.7 better, or should we just optimize for other pairs and launch them on demo? Any suggestions would be good
- nelhajj replied Sep 30, 2019
Here is the set file for USDCHF M5 image file