- Search Energy EXCH
- 2,887 Results
- Capablanca replied 3 hr ago
Thanks for the update mate. These days is more and more important that people share the payouts pending and paid, in order that we know how each prop is working. I hope that they will sort your payout soon. GL.
- Capablanca replied 7 hr ago
Apex has always a way of putting a SL on dangerous traders, the same way MFF did: stp them (which in futures would be to put them in live market).
- Capablanca replied 27 hr ago
I don't know who they are but it's good advertising url
- Capablanca replied 30 hr ago
That's why diversification is important. We hope that they don't go down all at the same time. Anyway, it was a nice ride with TFF these years. I was checking my records and my first challenge there (of several) was bought in Nov 2021, ...
- Capablanca replied 32 hr ago
The bankruptcy of TFF explained in one photo. url
- Capablanca replied 32 hr ago
I tend to agree but anyway, sooner or later: 1. They need to start banning the gamification (eg purchasing account after account with payouts and withdraw of everything, including buffer, and restart again). 2. New cowboys will come with unrealistic ...
- Capablanca replied 34 hr ago
That's a pity. My 5th most profitable prop. A scaled account being flushed.
- Capablanca replied 34 hr ago
I use Revolut and never had a problem (I'm in Europe). In offshore talks forum there is a lot of people warning about how Wise can be painful. I know that all banks and EMIs have unsatisfied people but Wise seems to have an abnormal number of cases. ...
- Capablanca replied 42 hr ago
As expected, with all the cowboys coming to futures arena we will see exactly the same pattern that we saw in forex, with more and more relaxed and generous rules, until most of them are not profitable any longer and start with tricks for not ...
- Capablanca replied 42 hr ago
This is why prop model won't work as we know it for much longer. Even a losing trader (in a real account) can make money in a prop. It's like I' offered an chance of purchasing calls or puts well below their market value.
- Capablanca replied May 10, 2024
It's the new mantra all over twitter: don't chose a cheap prop, they won't have funds to pay you.
- Capablanca replied May 10, 2024
They sent me an email today, similar to yours. They're saying they owe me a 1 x 200K standard but I had there 2 very old funded accounts, one of them even scaled. Not sure if I will receive an additional one in the future. Anyway, I won't waste much ...
- Capablanca replied May 10, 2024
Pretty heavy slippage on 10 lots (for a prop). Better to split 10 lots in 6+4 or something like that. I remember that MFF had slippage parametrized differently for whole positions (eg 10) and less for partial ones (6+4), despite the total was the ...
- Capablanca replied May 10, 2024
Why can't you charge back using wise ?
- Capablanca replied May 9, 2024
OK, I just found strange because I received almost 20 payouts with them and it's already my third most profitable prop. My payouts are small, though, never at 5 figures.
- Capablanca replied May 9, 2024
Really ? Never bumped in any in tweet, which is usually when the sh*t comes up faster.
- Capablanca replied May 9, 2024
I guess all props have this kind of vague rules: Not ideal but I prefer that they do like this instead of paying and terminating the funded account or denying payouts with gambling argument (which is also in most of props T&C).
- Capablanca replied May 9, 2024
I wonder how FXIFY is managing things. They are around for an year now, their rules are very relaxed and I have not heard any bad stories about denied payouts, hidden rules, decreased leverage, etc. Could it be because they have a broker behind and ...
- Capablanca replied May 9, 2024
This is how 5ers tries to eliminate gamblers image image
- Capablanca replied May 9, 2024
Great, now we have this topic turned into a clown playground with the clear intention of selling his signals. It's a commercial agenda, no matter how well he hides it and zero contribution about props. A pity that Masterrmind is not around any ...