- Search Energy EXCH
- 31 Results
- Alke replied Jan 27, 2022
I tried not to define if it went far enough, but more like noticed it reacted to last week low and Daily 200 SMA. So on days like this (after fuel with a clear direction), you would much prefer to wait for it reaching some far away targets or show ...
- Alke replied Jan 27, 2022
Decided to take some Longs on price reaction to some levels. Not sure though on timing (US open). Felt a bit lucky. Comments welcome
- Alke replied Jan 21, 2022
Seems good actually - especially given that there is half of that box (probably where most of volume is POC).
- Alke replied Jan 21, 2022
I was also looking at same spot but given the reaction lower and the close of candle I decided not take the bangers. But also if it goes higher i am reluctant to take given its Friday - so not sure. Looking back i believe some longs from where Digs ...
- Alke replied Jan 21, 2022
Seems like it behaved too good on a Friday. No mouse traps. Any comments are welcome (chart Gold M15)
- Alke replied Jan 20, 2022
Is it an okay spot to take some long bangers after US open when it retested London high? with same higher targets on mind?
- Alke replied Jan 19, 2022
haha, had a good laugh at it Had almost the same spots, looking at the drawdown and when finally remembered why we are here (as Digs) keep saying, just closed everything and finally the graph starts looking right again, no bias...
- Alke replied Oct 3, 2021
Hi Jr., Been following your stories for some time now thanks for sharing, helping a lot. If possible, could you please, as specific as you can, tell us how would you define the best swing spots? Like where you would be willing to risk more ...
- Alke replied Sep 28, 2021
Hi B.Mir, If i am not wrong, your initial sell entries at 10:27, they went like 30 pips against you. Usually you said like 15-20 max. You must have had good reasons to keep it going Where would you have taken the loss if some random up move? ...
- Alke replied Sep 27, 2021
So based on this example, once price moved beyond 20-40, will we go back in time to find the weekly structure to which it moved to and use those as actual weekly levels now? even if it is like very old?
- Alke replied Sep 27, 2021
Hi B.Mir, From your charts, what do you mean by actual weekly levels? From what I studied, it means some previous week levels at which price moved to when it expanded beyond last week high or low? Does this also work with daily levels when price ...
- Alke replied Sep 14, 2021
Jr, interesting you decided sell gold at that point. I would assume that would not be called the best swing point. If i may ask, where would be your stop point if it went against you?
- Alke replied May 5, 2021
hah, i see, thx for the answer
- Alke replied May 5, 2021
Hi Digger, For US30 positions, you were building those shorts for quite a while, would you have reversed it if it broke above those monthly/weekly highs?
- Alke replied Apr 20, 2020
Hi digger1, First of all thanks for your insights and sharing your thought process. Greatly appreciated even by lurkers like me If I may ask the question that's been bothering some time now while reading your posts. In most of your posts we ...
- Alke replied Feb 5, 2020
Heya Brixen, Single prints down to 405-425 (also small one below to 390) and second batch much lower 310- 345 - daily MP.
- Alke replied Feb 4, 2020
Thank you for all the wisdom and Patience with the forum
- Alke replied Dec 20, 2019
Happy Holidays Dutchy and Brixen. You guys make this forum alive and interesting. Thank you Dutchy for deciding to continue posting here - priceless commentary! Good luck in next year.
- Alke replied Jul 15, 2019
Hi nullx8, Is there any fee for the test period? And how long on average to pass the testing period? How does the funding work in case the testing is successful? Any company with a good record backing it? Thanks
- Alke replied Apr 8, 2019
Hi Brixen, We've checked the VWAP on FDAX volume with the VWAP for CFDs from some MT4 brokers, and it seems to fit pretty well. There are some periods where the discrepancy is noticeable but overall it seems pretty good.