- Search Energy EXCH
-
1odi replied Sep 12, 2023Actually that s quite good and refresshing to see them as an education provider if u think about it
Prop Firm Hub
-
1odi replied Sep 12, 2023i also had my lvrg cut by ICmarkets, still have the account but last few years traded more propfirms then own acounts. i recall asking support after the lvrg cut if Seychelle was still an option and what the lvrg would be like there, they said no ...
Prop Firm Hub
-
1odi replied Sep 12, 2023Let s not bullsh+t here pls...Most of the traders that failed with MFF weren t failing cos of slippage or marked up spreads (unless obvious ripoff during LO or NY sesssion, not NEWS) How come some manage to pull off some pretty nice gains while ...
Prop Firm Hub
-
1odi replied Sep 12, 2023I doubt that will be the case, as long there s demand they will find a way, maybe offshore, maybe unde the guize of training/gaming etc...who knows. Furthermore, imo the Bidenomics is just the stepping stone for the uphill battle that s to come for ...
Prop Firm Hub
-
1odi replied Sep 8, 2023Pay their novice users>>> that s all u need to know right there. If ur not trading futures ur dumb as F
Prop Firm Hub
-
1odi replied Sep 7, 2023Cos they know they can t come out and tell people outright to not sign up or use some services just cos they say so, so they go after the payment providers i guess. But if u think things thro, Deel is just another contracter, so unless they did ...
Prop Firm Hub
-
1odi replied Sep 7, 2023unless they were using Deel for other payments as well, i just don t see how would that discredit MFF. Maybe they want to force Dells hand to not do bussiness with prop firms anymore.
Prop Firm Hub
-
1odi replied Sep 7, 2023Evidence for the defendant u mean? cos all that shows is MFF paying off the profit split to traders?
Prop Firm Hub
-
1odi replied Sep 7, 2023Staff salaries i doubt it. they d have 2 prove they were in the know in order for that to happen. It would be best for all involved and us traders as well, if they d settle. Get some closure, see what are the repercussions and move on. if they drag ...
Prop Firm Hub
-
1odi replied Sep 7, 2023From what i know, once the money have exchanged hands, in tis case Murtuza paying the traders, and then the traders spending that money and so on, only 1 that has to pay back would be the 1 that commited the fraud, embezzelment etc. Unless that ...
Prop Firm Hub
-
1odi replied Sep 7, 2023i think he means that the traders with large payouts thro Deel are afraid of having to give back the money, i doubt that s the case
Prop Firm Hub
-
1odi replied Sep 5, 2023Also, the people that suposed to Regulate the markets don t know how the markets really work? what are they doing there then? we assume a lot of things but in the end it ain t gonna change the outcome of this crap. i don t know, it all just sounds a ...
Prop Firm Hub
-
1odi replied Sep 5, 2023Imo they did exist also in FT s case as they didn t just tuck tail and run, i recall there was a court of law involved, wich could ve led to the same outcomes u just said. Moreover, am i to believe that CFTC of US doesn t have enough manpower to ...
Prop Firm Hub
-
1odi replied Sep 5, 2023I don t understand 1 thing> How can they deny a payout based on the fact that u trade same way as others?(and here i ain t talking about same execution times) Just how many strategies are outthere? Also this BS of some people saying the markets are ...
Prop Firm Hub
-
1odi replied Sep 4, 2023In my opinion, i think u should look to those props that have an established track record of paying out traders, that don t find many excuses or have hindering rules etc. Would be a shame to go for the low priced offers and then when u finally get ...
Prop Firm Hub