- Search Energy EXCH
-
superjolt replied Sep 30, 2015Div @ 9600, target was 9700 though the trade appeared to be losing momentum so closed at +48 image
More simple is impossible
-
superjolt replied Sep 27, 2015Very useful - thanks for posting that Dee50. I've been spending a lot of time the last few days getting to grips with divergences, paying particular attention to significant levels etc. I kind of feel this is an essential base skill, but might be ...
More simple is impossible
-
superjolt replied Sep 23, 2015Thanks Dee50, makes sense. By comparing them I was trying to suggest that the macd indicated no divergene whereas the stochastics indicated regular divergence. I guess it's something that will eventually become second nature in spotting!
More simple is impossible
-
superjolt replied Sep 23, 2015Just when I thought I was getting the hang of divergence... what's the better signal stochastics or macd?


More simple is impossible
-
superjolt replied Sep 21, 2015Clive - how are you dealing with the situation where multiple opportunities occur at the same time on different pairs, particularly while you are in a trade already? I'm finding myself jumping around probably too much when I think I should really be ...
Trading is as simple as ABCD
-
superjolt replied Sep 20, 2015I might have missed it in a previous post, but curious to know if you move your SL to B/E at any point or do you set it and leave it regardless?
Trading is as simple as ABCD
-
superjolt replied Sep 18, 2015Thanks OAPDave, though I'm still none the wiser, though it appears to be something to do with breakout boxes
, I'm sure it would all make sense if I scanned more of the posts. I'll let the thread get back on track!Trading is as simple as ABCD
-
superjolt replied Sep 18, 2015OAPDave, intriguing, are you able to explain the chart please?
Trading is as simple as ABCD
-
superjolt replied Sep 16, 2015simply awesome, thank you for compiling this goldmine.
More simple is impossible
-
superjolt replied Sep 15, 2015Just trying to nail the main tactics you are using dee, would I be right in thinking that you focus mainly on BRN's, 123's (pos 2B's too?), fibs, backed up with divergence and trading the appropriate side of the 150 EMA?
More simple is impossible
-
superjolt replied Sep 15, 2015I would really like to see this thread get back on track, please give us all an update Clive!

Trading is as simple as ABCD
-
superjolt replied Sep 10, 2015Again, thank you. I had scanned all the posts over the last few days and interestingly I had already bookmarked all of those you mentioned - so I guess I'm thinking along the right lines.. just need to practice, read, practice, read.. and so on

More simple is impossible
-
superjolt replied Sep 10, 2015Thanks for looking, after more investigation I came to the same conclusion.
More simple is impossible
-
superjolt replied Sep 10, 2015Thanks MisterC, really appreciate your comments.
More simple is impossible
-
superjolt replied Sep 10, 2015Newbie to this thread, so be gentle please
I feel I should have caught this reversal simply by seeing the div and close over the MA - is my logic correct here? image More simple is impossible
-
superjolt replied Sep 9, 2015While looking into divergence, I came across this post which lists a whole bunch of divergence indicators: url I did try out the Stochastic_Divergence indi, it certainly came up with a bunch I hadn't noticed, but are these best avoided in favour ...
More simple is impossible
-
superjolt replied Sep 9, 2015Mindblowingly good. It looks like the entries were ahead of the close over the MA, or is that just because of the spread?
More simple is impossible