- Search Energy EXCH
- disbellj replied Nov 8, 2011
Kos, I'm sad to see you go. Everyone else: If no one gives feedback on the last single-pair EA I have given, then there will be no T101 EA made of this "strategy". If Kos, the creator of the "strategy" won't even test the EA to make sure it's what ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Nov 7, 2011
Kos, Just trying to help. Everyone: Well, it seems as though Kos is using an EA. Cool. Not using mine, but that's OK. Guess mine , which has over 60 downloads, just no one has given any feedback except zz, will collect dust. Anyone want to give ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Nov 7, 2011
zz, Honestly, VQ wasn't meant to be used alone I don't think. Read more here: url Kind regards, Don
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Nov 7, 2011
As long as I got electricity, I am determined to help people. Here is some truth money can't buy - literally. The Beautiful Truth: video Dying To Have Known: video Jesus loves you all. I love you all. If I offended any of you, I am sorry. Jesus ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Nov 5, 2011
Guys, I just got a shut-off notice from my electrical company, and notice of right to foreclose, all in this last week. Needless to say, I'm not in a position to help anyone. To say I care... I don't know how I feel. I tried to fight the good fight ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Nov 4, 2011
Yeah, at the time MrPip put LSMA, Trading Times, etc. into the T101 EA, I wasn't very receptive. First, I didn't know what the times were based on (I guess GMT now), what the LSMA was for, and MrPip also had added 10 LWMA by default, not LSMA, but ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Nov 4, 2011
Jeff, Would you kindly point me in the direction? Thanks. Kind regards, Don
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Nov 4, 2011
zz, Thank you for your insight. I was seeing same thing as far as late entry (which I can dea with), late BE (which I can't deal with). Let's say we have a trade, we get in, but on the STF, it's near the end of that trend when we do. So when retrace ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Nov 3, 2011
Here's the link, since there's only been 3 views so far: url The post is a page back. Kind regards, Don
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Nov 3, 2011
The problem was in the code. I fixed it. It is rev1 yesterday's date. That's the one to be testing right now. Today's date EA I have found BE problems and am fixing them now. Kind regards, Don
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Nov 3, 2011
No support will be given for EAs older than the last ones I posted. Please get latest ones posted to test
This is why I'm trying to roll out updates because of the exact things you're pointing out. Kind regards, DonIndicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Nov 3, 2011
zz, Frankly I came to VQ7, etc. from same standpoint on how we use HASmtf. With HASmtf, there is no waiting on TTF bar to close (at least not in my EAs so far, because if we are witing for TTF bar to close, then at least in EA there should be no ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Nov 3, 2011
to those of you who are having trade open and close, try setting CloseIfRetraceBeforeBE to False. Either that, or DON'T Scalp. Other than that, my opinion is to for us to change EA, stop using existing indicators on STF to set BE, and use top or ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Nov 3, 2011
zz, I see. I'm not using Kos' strategy. So really, it looks like I need to change: double TTFVQzzRed = NormalizeDouble(iCustom(NULL,STF,"VQzz2",TTF,7,MODE_LWMA,1,5,eblnTrueMode,0,0),0); double TTFVQzzGreen = ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Nov 2, 2011
OK. Here's an update. RETRACE = If STF trend disagrees with TTF trend. I kept scalping, but it is false as before. If scalping, a retrace starts, then trade is closed. No BE happens. I added BE+1 if retrace and in profit, when not scalping. When ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Nov 2, 2011
ANYONE having trouble might want to consider AT THE LEAST downloading latest EA from post: url -OR- BETTER YET, download the full Windows or Mac installations. I have not seen many trades in small amount of time with the latest EA. Kind regards, ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Nov 2, 2011
Hey guys, Just woke up. Getting a slow start. As for EachTickMode, I have it set to true. Why? Well, because I also have the EA set to make one trade per bar. And I feel we're using indicators that don't change many times per bar (Hasmtf doesn't for ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Nov 1, 2011
Telac, EXACTLY. This is why I prefer lower timeframes. Lower stoploss = bigger lots. But there are also more trades. All while risking same percent. Good thing for quickly compounding gains if they are winning trades. Bad thing for quickly ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Nov 1, 2011
Yeah, I started my trades (just had got done with latest EA and put it on) about 9PM Eastern last night. Fixed TTF HASmtf iCustom function (my mistake - wrong variable put in, but since it was TTF and wrong numbers were still showing downtrend on ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Oct 31, 2011
Here's to the crazy ones! — video video url
DonIndicators development for T101's not very simple method