KOS, I HAVE SAID IT MANY TIMES BEFORE, THE PROFIT-LOCKING NUMBERS THAT JULIUS POSTED ARE NOT THE SAME AS WHAT WAS IN HIS EA, SO WHAT IS IN THIS EA IS HIS POSTED VALUES, NOT WHAT HE HAD IN HIS EA. UNDERSTAND? When we look at the EA Julius put up for ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

GMT Offset of broker could be the reason for different entry times if condition 4 is used (UseTFforTrendConfirmation set to True in user inputs). Regards, Don

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

charvo, re-read my post. they are TRO's indicators posted on kreslik. I gave the name of the download that contains the MACD divergence indicator. I'm saying that if you download that indicator, there are ways to get values from it using buffers ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

charvo, If you're interested, I did see indicators by TRO that show divergence with a trendline just like Kos' picture. You might be able to figure out the names of the trendline drawn or some other way to know when divergence is signaled. Look for ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

I know zz. It's like how many times do you/we have to ask for the same thing? I'm done with this EA unless/until Kos can/will give us his rules as zz has said. If Kos can't give a step-by-step, then we are wasting our time, and I for one am done ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

charvo and Kos, I think one night is sufficient to conclude if the strategy is being followed in the EA, and if so, that the strategy is currently losing. I didn't say the strategy was a failure overall. CURRENTLY losing. And what better time and ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Well, the latest EA lost money on every demo I put it on last night, including Alpari UK (Kos' broker). So, either the EA did not trade Kos' strategy, or Kos' strategy is losing. Regards, Don

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

The latest EA which I uploaded saved me from a short trade at the end of the trend already (4th condition trend went short at end of GBPJPY trend). Got into Buys at 2:00 Eastern on two MBT demos and an ATC demo. We'll see how it goes. Thank you and ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

charvo, It is one possible idea, which I agree is a good one if we can't get more profit and less losses another way. Please try the latest EA with entry condition5. Who knows, it may work better than restricting ourselves to one trade per trend. ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Hello everyone, I used Robert's 060910_e to make this EA version. I just added buyconditon5 and sellcondition5. I did not add it just for trades 2+ of the same kind, so it will be used as condition for first trade also (which I don't think is such a ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

charvo, What? 7-8 pips? Per Julius profit-locking numbers he gave in thread (not what he put in his profit-locking EA unfortunately), profit-locking on 1 micro lot per pair basket starts at $5 if you get to $10. $5 / $0.10 per pip = 50 pips profit ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

finimej, Please don't confuse the issue with that chart. We are only concerned with calculation of Long Strong or Short Strong, which Julius provided us long ago. And he took spreads and currency value into account. All that is needed is to use GMT ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

On your picture, if I applied the rule for sell entry condition 5: if(Low[1] > Low[0]) SellCondition5 = True; ... would work for SellAll to keep us from getting in sell during ranging there, and would only get in after break of last bar's low like ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Kos, I see that since you are watching H4 timeframe as well as H1, you are putting precedence of H4 over H1, and saying a signal on H4 would possibly get us out of a trade on the H1. At this time, this EA only takes one timeframe into account at a ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

There ya go. Like clockwork, just as it was coded to do (of course, that was Kos' vision, I coded, and Robert fixed the actual trading functions, so it's been a group effort to get it done. I of course thank Kos and Robert both for their ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Kos, I have told multiple times on the problems with Samir's indicator (wrong bar used is main problem since MT4 gives you wrong bar as start bar for week open, maybe day open too, and I THINK either spread or currency value not taken into account. ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

trade4fun, I highly disagree. Because each broker has different open times for week and day, what Kos is looking at is NOT what we're looking at (unless you happen to be using Kos' broker or FXDD or another broker using GMT+2). Maybe, just maybe, ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

zz, Yes, it looks like Kos' broker uses same GMT offset as FXDD, which goes by the start/end of the Forex day 17:00. I have DST code too (which basically shifts one hour if DST is on, which I use a user input, just like I do for GMT Offset). zz it ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

OK, I figure the biggest difference between what Kos sees and what the rest of us see is due to Trend defined by Weekly and Daily, and the difference is due really to GMT Offset that Kos' broker uses. ATC brokers and MBT are both GMT -4. IBFX is GMT ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

1) This is not what is wanted. A buy can be done after a buy. It's not a must to go from buy to sell to buy to sell, etc. In fact, Kos never mentioned doing that. He says he waits on a retracement before buying again. If the retracement was ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method