- Search Energy EXCH
- 399 Results (272 Replies, 127 Comments)
- iwjw replied Apr 5, 2016
one of the problems here I see (someone already mentioned that) is maintenence once an EA is published by someone else than Remon The ink will not even be dry and you will get the first change request If you publish the .mq4 then in no time there ...
Accumulative Profits Grid System
- iwjw replied Apr 5, 2016
not meant sarcastic the system introduced here has some new aspects that I haven't seen so far in grid trading why post about totally different approaches that all have been coded in the past maybe it's because after 100 pages we still don't have ...
Accumulative Profits Grid System
- iwjw replied Apr 5, 2016
This thread started with a naked chart and a system that is based on moneymanagement alone In the meantime we got a gazillion of different EAs and none of them reflecting the initial idea for 100% Now we start talking indicators Amazing development
Accumulative Profits Grid System
- iwjw replied Apr 5, 2016
wouldn't that be the same as setting the profit share to 100%?
Accumulative Profits Grid System
- iwjw replied Apr 4, 2016
@abokwaik just wondering how you are closing toxic buy trades shouldn't there be a if(Bid>min_buy_price)? and then you would have to check again only if price reaches the secon lowest buy
Accumulative Profits Grid System
- iwjw replied Apr 4, 2016
written nonsense see my next post for what I mean Getting a little bit confusing here
Accumulative Profits Grid System
- iwjw replied Apr 4, 2016
I think this is not quite correct if(Bid<max_buy_price()-Start_Step_Size*Point && max_buy_price()>0) { check_for_close(); } if(Ask>min_sell_price()+Start_Step_Size*Point && min_sell_price()<999999) { check_for_close(); } the EA can close anywhere ...
Accumulative Profits Grid System
- iwjw replied Apr 4, 2016
only when price reaches a level it has to check for close at least it's what the strategy says
Accumulative Profits Grid System
- iwjw replied Apr 4, 2016
the EA should at least now have taken the positive buy trades and close the worst one without touching the pool the pool should only be used if the positives don't make up for the worst negative As per strategy the EA wouldnt look for a close ...
Accumulative Profits Grid System
- iwjw replied Apr 4, 2016
we got A-side and B-side filled with a few positions while price is moving up Now there is a pullback of one level and we close the highest position on B together with the lowest (means pricelevel) Let's assume we made a profit of 20$ Half of that ...
Accumulative Profits Grid System
- iwjw replied Apr 4, 2016
There will often be baskets closed negative because of the profit buffer / shared profit So you have to give some back from time to time
Accumulative Profits Grid System
- iwjw replied Apr 4, 2016
you are right I would suggest to store the recovery_cash into a GV otherwise it's not restartable
Accumulative Profits Grid System
- iwjw replied Apr 4, 2016
I think it's not yet what I thought it should be You have to think in levels Each level has to have a buy and a sell So if you are between max_buy_price and min_buy_price() and you reach a level where there is no buy position you have to open one ...
Accumulative Profits Grid System
- iwjw replied Apr 4, 2016
as far as I understood Vid. #2 If price moves up one level you make a buy and/or a sell if there isn't already a position at that price Highest buy/lowest sell price doesn't matter
Accumulative Profits Grid System
- iwjw replied Apr 3, 2016
For those of you who have BTed the R&R EA and are planning to forward test it: don't forget to reset the Global Variables to zero Otherwise the EA will start wrong from the beginning
Accumulative Profits Grid System
- iwjw replied Apr 2, 2016
I think you meant SELL LIMIT closing starts as soon as the profit sum of winning+worst losing positions is >=0 (this could be more than 2 Level pullback) In case the top sell is missing you need one level more for pullback But the profit of the ...
Accumulative Profits Grid System
- iwjw replied Apr 2, 2016
lets assume 2pip spread and 10 positions on both sides and the 11. doesn't get filled properly until then you have an advantage of 20 pips when you then start closing winners against losers there automatically will be unhedged positions on the other ...
Accumulative Profits Grid System
- iwjw replied Apr 2, 2016
it's a rare event that only one order gets filled if the spread is <10 points and even when, it's only one order that isn't hedged and that shouldn't kill the whole cycle
Accumulative Profits Grid System
- iwjw replied Apr 2, 2016
because they are negatively correlated you would have to trade them in the same direction otherwise you could be wrong on both this would only work as long as eurchf is trading in a tight range
Accumulative Profits Grid System
- iwjw replied Apr 2, 2016
one advantage of using pending instead of market orders by the R&R EA is that it eliminates the spread buys&sells are at the same price
Accumulative Profits Grid System