edoughig, I agree with you - approx. $1/pip, so I've set up the EA I built that way. BTW, I plan on implementing multiplier like I did in older EAs, so profit-locking values, etc. grow at same rate as Lots, which grows as account balance grows, but ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Texmade1, Cool! BTW, risking 10% per basket, I've made 8% in last couple days on demo with EA I'm building of your strategy. This is basically not buying above midline of full T101 chart range (control point?), and not selling below. That rule added ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Gvc, You're saying $0.10/pip, so the $300 gain was around 3,000 pips and not 300 pips today? Edit: I see you corrected it to be $1/pip. Regards, Don

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Gvc, You say you trade 0.1 Lots per pair. Is this one mini Lot per pair (so that $60 = approx. 60 pips, or approx. $1.00/pip)? If not, then 0.1 would mean one micro lot per pair (so that $6 = approx. 60 pips, or approx. $0.10/pip) You use multi ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

ajewopf, As long as trading functions are put in already (basic structure), then it's easier for me to go straght to EA and forego indicators first. I used to do as you recommend, but these days just go straight to EA and forego indicaotrs, and ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

So you're really just looking for a AbsoluteStrength cross (not cross and bar close, just cross) and agreement from TrendFinder (can have lime and yellow for buy, or red and yellow for sell). That won't be much to get that integrated. I think it'll ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Gvc, OK, so here's the conditions I'm expecting: 1st Buy entry: 1. Get blue arrow on current open bar (you didn't way wait until it' closed). Buy condition1 goes to True. 2. If buy condition1 is true, and you get a cross of QQEA or ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Gvc, The variables are declared (just given name) at top because they are global variables. The variables are defined in DefineStrategyVariables. This tells the EA what the variables means or is. The variables are then used in if/else statements in ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

texmade, Thepicture I show when I show Gc's strategy is using the 8-pair basket, since that is what he trades. When I show your strategy, I use the 14-pair chart because that is what you use. Maybe that's the reason it looks off? I just know I put ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Eric, I wanted to get back to this. I put it on my chart and it created the offline chart, which updated it looked like. But the comments wouldn't show on the chart when I put the EA on it. Maybe I did something wrong. I'll chec it again when the ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Tex, 1. Is that an indicator that draws the red and blue lines? (Edit, if hand-drawn, I could make an indicator it looks like. It looks as if I could draw a horizontal line on every 3LZZ Semafor 3, divide the range into top and bottom half, and ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

texmade1, How many bars back do you look for support and resistance (as I see it, unless told differently by you, I would look for highest high and lowest low of certain number of bars). Regards, Don

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Gvc and any other coders out there: I have started an EA which is IN PROGRESS AND DOES NO TRADES SINCE IT HAS NO RULES CODED. Having said that, I did slightly change the code from the TrendFinder indicator and put it in the EA. No matter what I do, ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

I was watching it when it happened. Wow! Nice. Very nice. Just as I expected, the price was manipulated up to "just" make a new high for the hour, but minutes before, price came down slowly. At 8:30 EST, price crossed to the negative for the hour ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

I got the EA this far, but have further to go for sure. Took a while to code just the above (since I don't know of a way to read object values from another chart, all calculations had to be programmed again, which I did). Edit: After doing it the ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Gvc, So you put the trades on manually with a script, wait for $60 profit before kicking in the lock profit function? All that can totally be automated, as well as the $60 scaled according to Lots. Also, I've set up my charts like yours on one demo ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

edoughig, I am using Julius' standard account (mini lot) locking numbers divided by 10 (to make micro lot locking numbers), then I divide Lots by One Micro Lot to get a Multiplier. I then multiply the locking numbers by the Multiplier to get the ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

edoughig, I went ahead and took the indicator (still looks to be an indicator), changed the default to 14 pairs (they are the correct IBFX pairs I checked), and added code to automatically determine pair suffix so that the user need not input this ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

georgec, The offline charts by by the indicator are a huge step forward for those of us that kept having problems with offline charts made by scripts and EAs. To get an EA to work with an offline chart made by the indicator, you must put the trading ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Looking at: url I see that Tex talked about a few indicators, but not support and resistance. I have support and resistance defined (could be defined multiple ways), but not used in rules. The bars indicator that shows different colors still seems ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method