- Search Energy EXCH
- disbellj replied Dec 21, 2010
diceman555, What's the name of the indicator you got on your charts showing red and green (ranging vs trending, S&R)? Thanks, Don
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Dec 16, 2010
Kos, Why'd you change your strategy? From what I see, the last one you had looked good. Was there something wrong with it? Also, it looks like Gvc's and Tex's are also good, so all 3 look good to me. Like I said, and as zz pointed out, there's just ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Dec 16, 2010
zz, Thank you my friend. I know there are easier ways. For instance, on a personal strategy yesterday that I put into an EA, it made 14% on one pair on one trade in one day risking just 2%, so 7:1 R:R. But when I put the EA onto multiple pairs ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Dec 15, 2010
Stilgare, Julius' money management was for 1 micro lot and 1 mini lot. There was no scaling of Lots or profit-locking values, both of which I provided in an EA, which automatically calculates for the trader how much to trade as their account grows, ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Dec 15, 2010
Kos, Again I see a pic that shows you made an entry before the arrow in the seprate window showed up. Buy since you wait for bar to close after arrow, wouldn't you have taken trade a couple bars later? Maybe I misunderstood what you said, so I'm ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Dec 15, 2010
Kos, I see that in this pic, your entry conditions were met on H4 tf at close of red bar with arrow. I understand that looking back, you note ranging, but at the time, you wouldn't have entered trade on open of next bar, since your entry conditions ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Dec 15, 2010
Kos, I had some questions: 1. I thought you said you waited for arrow bar to close for both indicators that draw arrows before taking the trade. If so, then wouldn't you get in Buy at red bar two bars to the right of the vertical line you drew? 2. ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Dec 14, 2010
HelwanPips, So you want to look through all history and have arrows put on chart when pairs are perfectly settled with either all Buys at top and all Sells at bottom, or all Sells at top and all Buys at bottom? This might be able to be done with my ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Dec 13, 2010
Cado, When I said repaints, sorry to offend. Perhaps you'll allow me to rephrase that: While the bar is open, it will move the present dot on the current bar. Hope that's more correct. I just know that people gripe about repainting indicators, and I ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Dec 13, 2010
Cado, No, me and TRO had a falling out some time back. I guess I'm one of the haters that got one of his threads shut down. I disagree with his teaching methods, although I do believe he knows what he's talking about. He just considers the way I ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Dec 12, 2010
RedPadisha, How sad. I've seen 18% gains in my real account in a day trading one pair (which was so stressful trading that day because I wasn't used to the stress that it took time to recover from it) and on demo I've seen 30% in a day. Depends on ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Dec 12, 2010
cadolino, Thank you. I'm not worried.
I like your setup. About the usefulness of the indicator in an EA is questonable to me, but as every other tool, it depends on how it's used in the EA or in the manual strategy that makes the difference. I ...Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Dec 10, 2010
tazmaan, You sure? Anyways, here's my point (and yes I am demo trading): I didn't make but 8.43% this week so far, and that's ONLY because I had so many losses, which if avoided by better implementation of Tex's strategy, or me makng some changes to ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Dec 9, 2010
Monty13, You're welcome. Thank you. Regards, Don
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Dec 9, 2010
Monty13, This is NOT a question for Gvc! PLEASE PAY ATTENTION! Do you see what you quoted? It's MY post where I posted A WORKING EA THAT DOES NO TRADES, and I EVEN CAPITALIZED THIS so someone like yourself wouldn't come along asking why you can't ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Dec 8, 2010
Gvc, That's cool. As long as TrendFinder happens after AbsoluteStrength cross (not cross and close, just cross), then that's the way my EA is written. We'll just have to see how it tests. Of course I hope it performs the way you trade, because if ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Dec 8, 2010
Andy, That's great man! Thank you for the fix. I was wondering what was going on. FXDD now works for 8 pair and 14 pair, where I was getting the zero divide error and the words on online charts previous indicator was dropped on would say 'Label'. ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Dec 8, 2010
Tex, Well, I'm back to 0.01% profit for week LOL Obviously not there yet. The simple rules I have concerning S&R midline may be hindering instead of helping (at least half the time). Regards, Don
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Dec 8, 2010
Gvc, I meant to ask you: When you get the cross of AbsoluteStrength, at that time do you look for TrendFinder agreement, or can that agreement happen later bars after the cross and still be valid? Regards, Don
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- disbellj replied Dec 8, 2010
Peter, In middle of night last night, got done with profit-locking part of code, so EA ready for testing. Testing it, I found a problem. I may have fixed it. Now testing again. As far as software development goes, I consider it's still in alpha ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method