- Search Energy EXCH
-
Halley replied Feb 21, 2014This is why I never use their standard libraries. The are hot and untested and if you find a bug, you cannot fix it, because it gets overwritten in the next update.
Bug reports for MT4 build 600+
-
Halley replied Feb 21, 2014The accuracy is poor, if you use the default (i.e. non-hacked) ST behaviour, because of the artificial open/close candle prices in Renko. So not even strategies with "use only open prices" work reliably. I do not know if there is non-standard ...
Is it possible to 'Backtest' Renko Bars in mt4?
-
Halley replied Feb 18, 2014You may increase the Market Watch list, the more symbols the more server clock updates. But it is not critical, from my experience the critical issue is the local PC clock, which usually synchronizes via internet once a day. But the computer is not ...
Candle time indicator like b-clock/P4L C but independent of ticks
-
Halley replied Feb 17, 2014If you accept the clock running as a script or EA, then you may modify mine:
Candle time indicator like b-clock/P4L C but independent of ticks
-
Halley replied Feb 2, 2014I did not even notice that it was possible with the recent MQL. So no change for me.
Problems compiling an indicator after new MetaEditor Update
-
Halley replied Feb 2, 2014I am not sure now, what you mean by "execution time of EAs" exactly. Don't you mean placing order response, do you?
Improve MT4 order execution speed by 500ms
-
Halley replied Feb 2, 2014Once in the start() method, there is no delay that could be detected. Once I measured dead time between sending a tick by the PostMessage, and invoking the start() method, and there was noticeable delay of a few milliseconds.
Improve MT4 order execution speed by 500ms
-
Halley replied Feb 1, 2014Hello hanover, if refreshing of the MT4 is what you ask for, you may consider using the RefreshCrapT4 from the SciTE project: url
Problems compiling an indicator after new MetaEditor Update
-
Halley replied Jan 29, 2014Well, the first works probably, but you lost chance to choose the manager class on the fly. The second does not work - since the instance of the manager died with the return statement and you would run into "invalid pointer" error.
MQL5 - operator new -> what for?
-
Halley replied Jan 29, 2014Not sure if links to Commercial are tolerated in this part of forum. If yes, then url , otherwise I will edit it out.
Problems compiling an indicator after new MetaEditor Update
-
Halley replied Jan 29, 2014Oh, I see, my fault. Should have been: ExpertManager* manager; void OnInit() { manager = new MyExpertManager(); manager.onInit(); } void OnDeinit(const int reason) { manager.onDeinit(reason); delete manager; } or other example ExpertManager* ...
MQL5 - operator new -> what for?
-
Halley replied Jan 29, 2014Oh I see, I missed the source was included in the end of the message. I do not use the above open version, so luckily I was not affected by the change. Actually I use range bars on 579, the one that I found in the Commercial part of this forum. It ...
Problems compiling an indicator after new MetaEditor Update
-
Halley replied Jan 29, 2014Imagine this: ExpertManager* manager; void OnInit() { manager = new ExpertManager(); manager.onInit(); } void OnDeinit(const int reason) { manager.onDeinit(reason); delete manager; } If you declared manager as local instead with the new, you could ...
MQL5 - operator new -> what for?
-
Halley replied Jan 29, 2014It probably depends on a vendor, for me they never stopped working if using the latest version.
Problems compiling an indicator after new MetaEditor Update
-
Halley replied Jan 28, 2014In general, the new can be used everywhere, while the local variable loses validity behind the current block. So if you want to keep the object for later use, you have to use the new operator. Otherwise if using in the current block only, you may ...
MQL5 - operator new -> what for?
-
Halley replied Jan 25, 2014Not sure, but it seems that the recently fixed indicators stopped working after update to 577. So we may not need fixing the recent code... It is probably a bug, but if they mean to go live on February 3, I would not expect such a defect so close to ...
Problems compiling an indicator after new MetaEditor Update
-
Halley replied Jan 25, 2014I wish you were true. Imho most code will get fixed and will be used in the crapware for another decade.
Problems compiling an indicator after new MetaEditor Update
-
Halley replied Jan 25, 2014Voila. And a link to its documentation, it is not easy to find either.
Is there a tick chart app for metatrader?
-
Halley replied Jan 25, 2014I expect coders should welcome such change - many trades spend minor pocket money for requests to fix their code. So let's get ready to help them, coders.
Problems compiling an indicator after new MetaEditor Update