- Search Energy EXCH
- 74 Results
-
HimmerJimmer replied Feb 6, 2026MT4 is terrible when it comes to doing accurate low time frame testing. The only way to verify these results are to check it live via demo
wicks get filled xauusd
-
HimmerJimmer replied Dec 4, 2021The effects of sharing a system is minimal, if anything. You think those big guys are looking on some retail forum to see what retail is up to? They coundn't care less. Retail counts for about 5% of trading volume in the forex market. Also, so what ...
(binned per thread starter’s request)The "Thinking is Optional" S
-
HimmerJimmer replied Dec 1, 2021I see. I used EMAs instead of MAs. Fixed it and now I see. Thanks
(binned per thread starter’s request)The "Thinking is Optional" S
-
HimmerJimmer replied Nov 30, 2021Here on EURUSD, I see this as a good long setup.
(binned per thread starter’s request)The "Thinking is Optional" S
-
HimmerJimmer replied Nov 30, 2021Just doing some backtesting and seen these two potentially epic setups on gold
(binned per thread starter’s request)The "Thinking is Optional" S
-
HimmerJimmer replied Nov 27, 2021Glad I found this thread. Reminds me of a system I used to little success. However, with this new knowledge, I'll definitely be revisiting it.
The Dance
-
HimmerJimmer replied Nov 23, 2021Ah. From what I know, they get it from their respective liquidity providers and provide the best bid and ask prices from a group of providers.. correct?
Neural network trading
-
HimmerJimmer replied Nov 23, 2021Well the data is imported directly from the broker themselves, so for EA testing it's much more accurate because it simulates the exact spreads and it's changes throughout the day, swaps, commissions, and even slippage. I trusted it enough to go ...
Neural network trading
-
HimmerJimmer replied Nov 22, 2021Interesting concept. No one has made an EA for this yet I see, so I guess I will.
EA Friday Gold Rush
-
HimmerJimmer replied Nov 22, 2021These ideas seem to be far beyond simple MT5 level backtests and such. I thought MT5 tick data was enough but now I'm not so sure. Seems to be the best accurate fit for testing EAs but once again this project seems beyond that.
Neural network trading
-
HimmerJimmer replied Oct 10, 2021Not bad. Pretty good and consistent. Running on multiple pairs and tested on tick data shows good results. I'll be forward testing from here
Engulfer
-
HimmerJimmer replied Aug 12, 2021I've done so and it is promising. I'll continue to trade it my way and you continue your way and we'll be profitable in our own way going forward.
BEEJAY Trading System
-
HimmerJimmer replied Aug 12, 2021Let me say this: I'm not against EA trading. I think it, when done right, can produce good returns. The issue I have with it is that when there's a good, profitable manual trading strategy someone makes and people make an EA of it. Then the EA ...
BEEJAY Trading System
-
HimmerJimmer replied Aug 12, 2021Well, fair enough. But impulsive thinking can be trained out of a trader. A robot does what you set it to do but in some cases a deviation may be necessary. You may be able to get a very high win rate bot sure. But you can also learn to execute ...
BEEJAY Trading System
-
HimmerJimmer replied Aug 12, 2021Not trying to provoke anyone. Just stating that in cases such as this, it's more lucrative to trade manually than to try to automate a strategy
BEEJAY Trading System