- Search Energy EXCH
- 18 Results
- cprcrack replied Jun 23, 2015
Actually it seems that the example is in fact correct in practice also. For some reason my previous attempts to verify it failed but I just tried with a new demo test and it's working. As you mention there's some difference due to the extra cost and ...
- cprcrack replied Jun 21, 2015
Found a bigger list: url
- cprcrack replied Jun 21, 2015
So it seems that we are safe with majors and the most traded currencies? The only currency that surprised me a little bit in that list is the Danish krona (DKK).
- cprcrack replied Jun 21, 2015
Is there a list of pegged currencies somewhere? If not, can you mention some pegged currencies you know about?
- cprcrack replied May 2, 2015
I have run a test with a real strategy traded over months with hundreds of trades and my conclusion is that when the risk is increased by 2x both the Monthly Gain and Draw Down are increased by aproximately 2x. Same thing with any other multiplier. ...
- cprcrack replied May 2, 2015
I'm defining Monthly Gain as the same figure that myfxbook.com displays for the strategies, i.e. the "monthly compound rate of return leading to the total gain". So the draw downs are already factored, everything is already factored. It's the ...
- cprcrack replied May 2, 2015
I made another two simple simulations (graphs C and D bellow) which involve only two trades. C represents a loser and then a winner and D represents a winner and then a looser. In both cases according to my calculations the strategy that runs at ...
- cprcrack replied May 2, 2015
I see. Your examples were really helpful. However if we are right and scenario B is the correct one, is myfxbook.com risk multiplier broken? When you select a risk multiplier of 4x, the expected drawdown increases by 4x, and the monthly gain ...
- cprcrack replied May 2, 2015
I understand what you mean with the drift, but where am I assuming that? Most importantly, which simulation is the correct one according to you: A, B or neither?
- cprcrack replied Mar 9, 2015
Huge thanks, I found the source: url
- cprcrack replied Mar 9, 2015
Wow totally true, I feel silly for not thinking about it, thanks!
- cprcrack replied Mar 8, 2015
I understand this can be obvious for you, but I would really appreciate if you could be clear about it. Are you saying the stats can be manipulated?
- cprcrack replied Mar 8, 2015
But the stats of myfxbook must be true right? I mean, if they have the two green ticks they cannot be manipulated right? What maybe worries me more if the possibility that this results were obtained with a very high risk, and thus the account could ...
- cprcrack replied Mar 8, 2015
Could you please elaborate? If you see it's clearly a scam, why is that? Why should I avoid it and how to detect this type of scams?
- cprcrack replied Mar 8, 2015
I'm currently learning, I'm a programmer and I'm currently developing trading bots I hope to make profitable in the future. However this seemed an investment opportunity, so I'm not really evaluating it as a way to learn how to trade, just as an ...
- cprcrack replied Mar 8, 2015
¿? As I told you I'm asking for advice on it, because I'm basically quite scared of being the victim of some kind of scam or alike. My live trading experience is null, and I created this account to ask about it here (been reading for some weeks). It ...
- cprcrack replied Mar 8, 2015
I plan to trade several times per day. In theory the more you trade (provided your trades are profitable on average) the more stable your strategy can be considered, i.e. being profitable over 1000 trades is more significant than being profitable ...
- cprcrack replied Mar 8, 2015
In my opinion one of the most important things when trying with a demo account is to make exactly the same deposit you plan to make with a live account. That way you will have a more realistic sense on the net profit and loses you will be risking. ...
- Posts by Member Search: 'cprcrack'