- Search Energy EXCH
- 16 Results
- burnssss replied Nov 16, 2014
MESSAGE OF EURUSDD "Everyone, this should show you that fx-jay is probably the one who hacked my account. Look at this picture carefully. The background is my account and he has access to my private mails. I do not think burnsss or ginger every sent ...
- burnssss replied Nov 16, 2014
MESSAGE OF "EURUSDD" Finally: I only removed my picture on friday. But the message to fx_jay had this picture image All those who visited this thread can confirm that my real picture was used every time till friday when this so called thing ...
- burnssss replied Nov 16, 2014
MESSAGE OF EURUSDD "This is a snapshot of one of the conversations: Now: have I ever communicated with fx_jay privately before? NO! Do I ask people on this forum to explain their system or trading style to me? NO. I think i even advise everyone to ...
- burnssss replied Oct 28, 2014
My understanding of transient / recurrent image "h" dynamic, but in this case, "h" is not higher of a certain parameter. The higher the "h" less precision. Is a condition in my case
- burnssss replied Oct 1, 2014
I think we all know the direction. So I still think 2820 is still valid. image
- burnssss replied Sep 23, 2014
Very good document Vlady. It is convenient to continue naming "k", but now we have not considered. "k" tells us if "h" is correct. Whereupon, it is a lot of information. "k" is an integer, and in probability is called the "mean hitting times". I ...
- burnssss replied Aug 19, 2014
But ye are using recurrent area? I thought the way to use it is as of picture below. The biggest problem is to get "k" correctly. "h" is a function of Timeframe and "k". image
- burnssss replied Aug 17, 2014
image there are two conditions
- burnssss replied Jan 28, 2014
@ gg53 I continued calculating the above example without changing the pattern [0 1] that the market gives me. But the signal appears in next bar of previous example. How to evaluate these situations?. Some other statistical principle not yet seen? ...
- burnssss replied Jan 27, 2014
@ gg53 Very good, to correct "errors of prediction", always use "Monty Hall"? I have a problem in a zzleg. The market gives me fractal pattern [0 1], I try to correct with Monty Hall so that my remaining combinations are: [1 0] = 204 Occurs [1 1] = ...
- burnssss replied Jan 13, 2014
@ gg53 very good. I performed all the steps. 1 - get set1 2 - get set2 3 - set1 filter to get set3 4 - Calculation of fractal pattern match according to the pdf 5 - In case 4 is accepted, probability calculation in length as you indicated in post ...
- burnssss replied Jan 10, 2014
Gg53 thank you very much for your reply. Regarding your explanation, there have been several questions that have to do with the calculation process. I'll catch up first: I'll catch up a first calculation process and this leg zigzag like me might ...
- burnssss replied Jan 9, 2014
@ gg53 I must be doing something wrong. capture introduce and comment: image 1 - start to calculate from the red vertical line 2 - introduce fractal pattern [1] and according to probability, this pattern is correct 3 - in a length L = 5 bars gives ...
- burnssss replied Jan 9, 2014
@ gg53, crodzilla, smallcat You could explain this process? To explain better attached a screenshot with two signals. We look at the last signal: image We would start counting from the last signal bars? if so, we would introduce a bullish fractal ...
- burnssss replied Jul 12, 2013
Sorry Madmoney that IQ settings you?, I leave the pins as you, the same is by the number of candles image
- burnssss replied Jul 11, 2013
image sorry
- Posts by Member Search: 'burnssss'