- Search Energy EXCH
- 41 Results
- jamesanderson replied Jan 15, 2008
Actually this is for the Forex Sytem Selector which is run by Auto Trader. The topic being discussed is FXCM's Managed Accounts which they personally oversee they are completely different.
- jamesanderson replied Dec 6, 2007
Hey Moe,From what I understand from talking to other brokers it is highly against their non-disclosure agreements to give the names of their liquidity providers. Every other broker I have ever spoken to was not allowed to tell. I wonder why IBFX ...
- jamesanderson replied Dec 6, 2007
Haha, Justin I find it rather hysterical how defensive you are about this and unprofessional really. Frankly, I would think if you were so sure that none of your guys were involved in this that you would have simply ignored the post. I however find ...
- jamesanderson replied Dec 6, 2007
Interesting post. If I was a company supervisor I would definitely be pulling phone recordings right about now - if nothing else just to be sure. So shady. Perhaps they're getting desperate as their capital is not looking like it may suffice.
- jamesanderson replied Dec 6, 2007
haha yeah. Well at least you can take it as a good comparison for how a much more established broker likes to present itself as vs a non-established one. The non-established one thought that by simply presenting themselves as if they have enough ...
- jamesanderson replied Dec 5, 2007
Moe - I completely agree with you. As I have posted before I always thought this firm was shady. Sure there is nothing wrong with being based out of a country not known for financial intergrity but let's face it, any firm that truly is serious and ...
- jamesanderson replied Dec 5, 2007
The NFA is far from perfect but by shutting these guys down they not only protect the consumer but hopefully will also attract legitimate players to the market. While it is good to have a large variety of choices to trade with, it is not good to ...
- jamesanderson replied Dec 4, 2007
While this is mostly true in forex I find your answer rather self-serving as you try to make the word market-maker appear somehow devious. Here is another explanation for market maker: url
- jamesanderson replied Dec 4, 2007
I couldn't agree more. Not to mention since they are the largest bank in the world in terms of currency transactions it is hardly a huge risk for them - and they earn the spread. All they did was find another way to make more money.
- jamesanderson replied Dec 4, 2007
haha the same thing happened to me. That's what we get when hollywood pays millions of dollars to scam us into liking movies and songs - they figure after you have heard that aweful song 20 times you will give up and see the film.BTW, good job forex ...
- jamesanderson replied Dec 4, 2007
MT4 should have no influence on their execution style especially if they maintain their regular platform as well and offer both based on a clients preference. It would not be in their best interest to go back to dealing desk - much more risk for ...
- jamesanderson replied Dec 3, 2007
News on One World Capital - they're definitely going under... url
- jamesanderson replied Nov 28, 2007
I seriously looked into them and a lot of what they offer is good plus they have good financials. The big reason why I decided against it was that their inactivity fee bothered me. I often don't trade for a couple months (especially during the ...
- jamesanderson replied Nov 26, 2007
I really would never even slightly consider trading with them. Their entire background is shady with their offices in Cyprus and Belize. On top of that both governments deny that they are regulated there and have warned people against trading with ...
- jamesanderson replied Nov 21, 2007
FriendofTrends - you are 100% correct. As with any other investment vehicle it is your responsibility to look into the details. Unless of course you are a moron, as many people are, and then you don\\\'t do your own due diligence and then blame ...
- jamesanderson replied Nov 19, 2007
Think what you want about trading your own account with FXCM but putting money in a managed account is a different story. I have been able to withdraw funds whenever I have needed to and this fund has been far more profitable than most of my other ...
- jamesanderson replied Nov 13, 2007
I'm all for competition but you are delusional. It is not simply about the net excess capital they have. The fact that a firm was only required previously to have a small amount of net excess capital means they are really small. In a market this big ...
- jamesanderson replied Oct 17, 2007
Actually their results for the year are good. One fund is up 24% and another 37%. url
- jamesanderson replied Sep 19, 2007
Wow, this is precisely the reason why everyday some people in the world get ripped off. Yes, let's wait and see, unless of course you have money in one of these firms. Are you really going to want to "wait and see" if the firm gets shut down and ...
- jamesanderson replied Aug 29, 2007
Wow, if Forex Savior works for FXCM then who do you think WhipSawFX works for? I have seen the same post on several forums today. WhipSaw, you're bringing up OLD news and frankly I'm not sure how relevant it is.