- Search Energy EXCH
- 37 Results
- madsuh replied May 20, 2015
what do you mean by second Payment? Do you mean my remaining outstanding balance over the 50K?
- madsuh replied May 20, 2015
Just to give everyone a heads up as well. I did receive the first 50K Pounds on the 20th. Unfortunately my exchange rate was 1.1384 ;( I wish they would have waited another 2 days. Anyhow, glad we are getting some money back now. G/L all
- madsuh replied Mar 17, 2015
Just another update from me. My balance was ok 92K Euro, still haven't claimed my wife's account which is sub 50K. I have also decided to claim via the FSCS. Finally, I have spoken to the FSCS and they told me that they have not yet decided in what ...
- madsuh replied Mar 13, 2015
Thanks Papa... this indeed sheds some light on this. The only case where I could imagine that you'd get out more by claiming against the administrators would be if i.e. client funds were 10Mio, and overall debt (creditors) were 100Mio. In this case, ...
- madsuh replied Mar 13, 2015
I don't get it. Why would anybody choose to keep claiming with the Administrators? Maybe I am not getting this correctly, but aren't the dividends paid out of company assets? Here is a quick example for all of you. a) I have 100K b) 90K could ...
- madsuh replied Mar 10, 2015
Well... I am not sure whether anyone will try it, but heck... what do I have to lose?
- madsuh replied Mar 10, 2015
thanks papamax. I don't think that your assumption is correct. There is plenty of money left in the company. Probably still close to 20Mio. Yes, they owe 45Mio to creditors, but I am thinking if it's 45.5Mio in the end then they would simply do a ...
- madsuh replied Mar 10, 2015
I am wondering if I can make a claim against the company for unrealised profits. Basically, if I can show that my trading was 100% structured. In my case, all of 2014 I was opening EU50 on the first possible date and closed it on expiration. I had ...
- madsuh replied Mar 9, 2015
works now, I guess I had a Javascript bug or some other issue. Unfortunately, it also tells me that I need to wait for Alpari to send the email. Thanks, Peter
- madsuh replied Mar 9, 2015
Is this the real site? Please confirm, as I am not getting any notice when I try to log in.... not even that the login failed or my account is not ready yet...
- madsuh replied Mar 9, 2015
btw... the old KPMG link doesn't work anymore. Where can I find the claims portal link?
- madsuh replied Mar 9, 2015
Quick question.... I ready on Forex Magnates today that we could only get a maximum of 50,000 GBP back. url "On Wednesday, the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme officially stated what many already expected: Clients of Alpari UK will be ...
- madsuh replied Feb 25, 2015
I was actually just reading this again. I am very curious if this is indeed true and if so, I perfectly agree with you. It very much seems like the try to sell the company belongs to Objective 3. I am also not sure why they didn't phrase it more ...
- madsuh replied Feb 25, 2015
no, I don't want to lower KPMGs share at all... you will never succeed as you will never be able to prove anything. What I am looking for is a simple breakdown of what costs had occurred in the name of shareholders, creditors, and clients and spilt ...
- madsuh replied Feb 25, 2015
thanks, but I see things differently. a) we should only be charged what really belongs to us b) we should split the fees where there is overlap (what overlap do you see for something like "health & safety"? c) we only know the cost until now ...
- madsuh replied Feb 25, 2015
Ok, how do we get this started? How do we reach enough clients? My idea would be to collaborate on a document via Google Docs, where we state what we think would be a better approach, then ... a) ... by the end of this week, we offer a download ...
- madsuh replied Feb 25, 2015
the question is whether we can change the proposal before it goes on a vote. One thing I can tell you for sure, you will not be able to negotiate their fees. If anything, we can negotiate beforehand what percentage of the fees would be covered by us ...
- madsuh replied Feb 25, 2015
yes, they could... but really, we should not have received anything from a sale. The only positive would have been, that we could have continued to remain clients, but as far as interested go, I am not a shareholder and I am not a creditor, so why ...
- madsuh replied Feb 25, 2015
this is the one I tried to quote not a problem, if there is overlap, we can share the cost on a pro rata basis. For example, if we are owed 60m and creditors are owed 20m then those cost should be shared 75% client money and 25% creditors. In ...
- madsuh replied Feb 25, 2015
not a problem, if there is overlap, we can share the cost on a pro rata basis. For example, if we are owed 60m and creditors are owed 20m then those cost should be shared 75% client money and 25% creditors. In general our fees should be: ...