- Search Energy EXCH
- 683 Results
- CableJ replied Jun 4, 2024
partial fills are normal in a real exchange/ecn environment... and no it's not considered DCA otherwise everyone not trading 1 contract would eventually be in violation.
- CableJ replied Jun 4, 2024
The only ways this ever makes sense to me is if you want to risk 2% per trade but you scale into total position with let's say 4 .5% entries.. this can help with getting the timing wrong but the eventual trend direction correct. The other is using ...
- CableJ replied Jun 4, 2024
Longer Min trade days even with the micro trade foolishness still make sense from the prop perspective. It increases the odds that the prevailing market dynamics that led to a trader's potential lucky streak can possibly change, which increases the ...
- CableJ replied Jun 3, 2024
There is a reason, you just refuse to acknowledge the root cause despite what you are repeatedly told. Trading is hard enough already without trading in desperation with scared money.
- CableJ replied Jun 3, 2024
Apex denied payout clarification.... They want to see if you can trade successfully without using the rule breaking strategy. Balance on day of denied request / days traded from last payout/start of pa (if new) * 10 days = new target with no rules ...
- CableJ replied Jun 3, 2024
Once the 90% sale is over... the server issues will very likely also be over
- CableJ replied Jun 2, 2024
Unlike Apex topstep does have consistency during eval, so the yolo gamblers have to do it more than once.
- CableJ replied Jun 2, 2024
trade normally with current bal & normal contract sizes for next 10d without breaking rules to hit next 15-20th payout cycle.
- CableJ replied Jun 1, 2024
You just have to go another 10d period without breaking any rules or blowing the account.
- CableJ replied Jun 1, 2024
Yes... each account holders # of evals, # of PAs, # of resets, # of PAs in reserve, # of 1x payouts, # of payouts, total of payouts, total current P&L, R:R. They will also be tracking blown PAs to see what the R:R ratio was in those accounts too.
- CableJ replied Jun 1, 2024
3 accounts max (at the time) + daily limit + scaling plan + 5 days of >$200 to get 50% payout & 30 days of >$200 days to get 100% payout made topstep way less attractive to the cheaters. That being said... DCA, NY open & news bracket trading, 100% ...
- CableJ replied Jun 1, 2024
Have not been around here for several days... I see I missed a bunch of noise about Apex finally enforcing their own rules & our 2 resident trolls up to their normal circle jerk clown routine. I mentioned weeks ago that the multiple traders with ...
- CableJ replied May 13, 2024
these back to back month long 80% off discounts have made me a bit nervous about Apex.... huge payouts + sudden shift in discounting is not a good combination to me.
- CableJ replied May 12, 2024
it used to be <8K.... these days it's anyone's guess
- CableJ replied May 12, 2024
The other issue never factored into these fantasy spreadsheets is that liquidity is not infinite. That 500 lot GBP/JPY trade with minimal slippage is never happening. In fantasy projections, the system I use @ Apex & AMP would turn me into a ...
- CableJ replied May 7, 2024
Days before shutdown Josh was hinting that they figured something out with the data and they were about to start paying traders even if they blew accounts... do you have any idea what that may have been?
- CableJ replied May 7, 2024
Andrew used his platforms as a stick to get payouts that would have normally been denied... pay me or else this could get very ugly for you.. now you wouldn't want that, would you?
- CableJ replied May 7, 2024
he has no system..... his edge is the futures prop model. Going all in on report releases, earnings & NY open will eventually lead to disaster as it did for him today.... but to his credit he's way in the green since he started, but he's also an ...
- CableJ replied May 7, 2024
Makes you wonder how AndrewNFX is still claiming 100K a month from fx prop trading... when he's banned from the only firm that will pay high 5 figures on >300K in funding lol.
- CableJ replied May 7, 2024
That didn't seem to affect MFF @ >20M per month. The case revealed that their margins were insane and they only sent 1% of their book to market.